Bring the relevant context.
Use project evidence and supported memory sources you explicitly provide or configure.
Open-source tools for AI-assisted engineering
Work with your agent to develop a specification, plan a change, and review build, repair and test results. Harness keeps the agreed scope and task evidence available so you can decide what happens next.
CollaborateAttune Harness
The lead project · Attune Harness
Develop the specification, agree with the scope, and inspect the evidence as work progresses.
Complex work starts with a specification you can review: requirements, constraints and acceptance criteria. Harness supports the next steps with explicit scope, retained decisions and checks you can inspect.
Work with your agent to record requirements, constraints and acceptance criteria before implementation.
Inspect the allowed files, proposed work and acceptance checkpoint before authorizing execution.
Use scoped workflows with permitted files and declared verification checks alongside your agents.
Assign a separate reviewer to assess a document against project sources. Keep unsupported claims and uncertainty visible.
Run checks on captured changes. Inspect what ran, what passed and what failed before deciding the next step.
Inspect saved task state and recover context from supported, configured sources before resuming work.
See what passed, what failed and what needs another look. Harness keeps the output and check results together so you can review the work before deciding what to do next.
Accepting intent and authorizing execution are separate decisions. Paid calls need their own authorization.
A passing check establishes what it tested. It does not guarantee every output is correct.
Published: Attune Harness 1.3.0. Package and release guide
Browser forms guide intake and intent approval. Each workflow retains its own execution permissions and checks.
In one exporter comparison, command-line checks found three defects that direct serializer checks had missed.
The result applies to that example. General model reliability needs separate assessment.
Read the comparison and its limits
A passing check establishes what it tested. Native planning and building remain experimental. Claude Code and Codex have documented setup paths; Antigravity integration is unverified in this review. Native MCP panel delivery remains unverified. Review the qualification guide.
Context and useful next steps
A bounded workflow with your agent: bring relevant context, review possible follow-up work, and decide what is worth pursuing.
Use project evidence and supported memory sources you explicitly provide or configure.
Retain an opportunity-review checkpoint with its goal, progress, evidence and unfinished review.
Assess the proposed benefit and uncertainty. A saved suggestion grants no execution authority.
Scoped recall and saved review checkpoints are supported. Automatic access to all chat history is not implied; the richer opportunity-ranking and selection journey remains proposed. Review the current boundary.
Help shape what comes next
Proposed paths for contributors, potential pilot customers and open-source sponsors.
Start by building together
Help improve specification development, planning, build and repair workflows, and independent checks. Bring a reproducible problem, a design question or a contribution.
A starting conversation could identify a useful contribution, its scope and how to check it. Documentation, usability and real workflow evidence matter alongside code.
Explore a possible customer engagement
Explore one workflow guided by a specification, from a clear goal and agreed scope to evidence you can review. Define what a possible pilot would need to demonstrate.
Possible starting points include developing a specification with explicit acceptance criteria, reviewing a generated document against project evidence, or checking a scoped agent-assisted change. Scope, responsibilities and commercial terms would need separate agreement.
Support work in the open
Discuss support for an open-source milestone in specification workflows, independent checks or usable documentation, with its scope, evidence and limits stated up front.
A discussion could connect support with an agreed milestone in usability, documentation or verification. Milestones and any sponsorship terms remain to be defined.
Supporting tools and earlier work
Harness is the current focus. Supporting libraries and earlier project references remain available.
Earlier project · Memory and workflows
Reference for the earlier project’s memory and workflow tools. Existing code and documentation remain available.
Attune AI referenceStructured questions and decisions
Make questions and choices easier to review, with structured answers validated on return.
Explore Attune FormsRetrieval with citations
Retrieve relevant project sources and return citation records for the next step.
Explore Attune RAGBuilt by Patrick Roebuck
The direction is practical: make agent work easier to authorize, inspect and evaluate. The next step is to find useful problems to work on together.